Mineralogy MacGyver

What do you do when you're out in the field and you really really wish you could positively identify a particular mineral? There are ways of doing this which are no longer taught - involving powders and torches and things like that - I never learned these methods, these days we just take the rock home and make a thin section.

We were in northern Mozambique looking at what appear to be charnockitized gneisses - which should by definition contain pyroxene - normally orthopyroxene. However, the thin sections we made last year just had clumpy biotite - maybe replacing opx? But without finding any remnant opx we couldn't be sure if it had ever been there, or if all the patchiness we could see in the rock was just clumpy biotite. We crushed up some of the gneisses, which wasn't too hard to do because they have a nice "sugary", recrystallized annealed texture and readily fall into angular "sand". Some of the grains had a greenish smokey luster - possible orthopyroxene? Or just ugly looking feldspars? Or quartz with some micro inclusions? If only we could see the birefringence of the mineral grains we could readily pick out the opx - which has higher birefringence - from the feldspar and quartz, which have similar, low birefringence.

Birefringence is the effect when light passes through a crystal more quickly in one direction than in another, effectively splitting light like a prism. The strength of this effect varies with the wavelength of light as well as with the properties of the crystal. The birefringence of different minerals is a characteristic feature that can be used to identify them. To see this effect, geologic microscopes use two polarizing filters. Full-spectrum light is passed through a polarizing filter and then through a thin section of rock (30-microns is the usual thickness for this slide). Then the light passes through a second, polarizing filter perpendicular to the first one and through to your eye.

Two polarizing filters at right angles to each other will block all light - so if there is no rock slide in the path of the light, or if there is just glass or some other isotropic material in the path of the light, you will see nothing at all. However, a birefringent rock sample will take the oriented light and twist it - allowing some of it to pass through the second filter. The colour you see will change depending on how strongly the mineral "twists" the rays of light.

So what to do in the field with no slide, no microscope, no way to estimate the birefringence of these mineral grains? Kosuke came up with an answer - like geologist MacGyver. He used the polarizing filters from his camera lenses - mounted them on an incandescent head lamp (torch) and put the mineral grains in between. He then carefully rotated the top filter so that it blocked out all light except for what was passing through the mineral grains. Voila! A field petrographic microscope!

Did it work? Sadly, not really. The problem was, of course, that all the mineral grains had different diameters and therefore the path of light through the minerals wasn't constant. As the colour you see is a function of the length of path as well as the properties of the crystal, we couldn't keep this factor constant and were left with uncertain results. However, it was a pretty good exercise (and a lot of fun) and a reminder of the basic principles of geology which we sometimes take for granted.

You know what? Identifying rocks is pretty hard. Very few minerals come in only one color or shape, and a little bit of weathering or deformation can change the appearance of a rock pretty drastically. Geologists and geology students have to learn a whole range of criteria which change from place to place and rock to rock. It's a lifetime effort to learn to identify rocks, accelerated by seeing as many rocks as one possibly can but one can never hope to see them all.

In accretionary wedges - my "specialty" (if I have one, that is) - low temperature metamorphism and high strain can result in all the rocks looking pretty much the same - it can be very difficult to tell an igneous rock (eg. basaltic ash from the ocean floor) from a sedimentary one (e.g. volcaniclastic greywacke). It's hard to tell students that the first basic thing we tell them about rocks - that there are 3 types (igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary) might be the last thing you figure out about a particular rock sample. Some day when I have the time I'd like to teach myself some of those old techniques for identifying minerals without a microscope - I'm sure they would come in handy.


Ishmael said...

When I was in school we used to lick the rocks. Did you try that?

Honestly, I don't even remember what that was supposed to tell us.... Maybe it was just the prof goofing on us.

Ahh, good times; good times.

Lost Geologist said...

Licking a rock to determine its taste and porosity. Porous rocks have a tendency to stick to the tongue, sediments with lignite have a funny sweet taste, different salts may be distinguished (like NaCl or KCl), the particle size of sands and clays can be estimated quite well by chewing them between your teeth (dont tell ur dentist). Also smell is useful, the smell of garlic is a good clue that you have plenty of arsenic, sweet smell often comes from lignite or coal, foul odor from H2S, sulfur smell from sulfides, etc.

Still, I more often than not dispear in identifiying minerals in the field. :(

andrew said...

I'm so happy to see a geologic PhD say that rocks are a bitch to identify, because they really are. You take a group of lay people out and they keep showing you rocks and so many times you can only shrug. If I win the lottery, I'm outfitting myself with a nice rock lab.

Lost Geologist said...

andrew is totally right! more often than not i can only tell my relatives what they already know anyway when they show me rock to identify. i just use more fancy words to cover up that i am just as clueless sometimes as they are. hehehe....

CamArchGrad said...

What ever happened to taking a streak plate, swingnet or a known moh's scale of hardness (like a nail or a penny or a diamond) into the field? Doesn't anybody stare at cleavage any more? ( I guess it's un PC)

Edible rocks are mainly sedimentary,(a granite tastes like a basalt which tastes like an amphibolite).

Andi said...

hi Christie,

I work with Pilgrim Films on a documentary show called "In Harm's Way" as we follow individuals in their dangerous jobs - we want to follow a speleologist as they explore caves. Does your research ever take you in that direction? If so and if you might be interested, please email me at themoviemc@aol.com.
Best, Andi




情趣用品,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,日本AV,寄情築園小遊戲,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,色情遊戲,一葉情貼圖片區,色情網站,色情影片,微風成人, 嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人影片,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,080視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室



麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打

麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,線上遊戲,矽谷麻將,明星3缺一,橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,遊戲區,電玩快打,cs online

情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊