Showing posts with label field work. Show all posts
Showing posts with label field work. Show all posts

9/14/2009

First Fold 2009

The traditional "First Fold" picture - see 2008 and 2007). I just can't get enough of this cool folded bed in the lower Prince Albert Formation.
This class was fun - and every one of them was pretty keen in the field! Also did their chores without nagging! Truly a first on both counts. It was a nice one to go out on - my last trip to Laingsburg, at least as a lecturer at UCT.

It was a big year for transitions - as Dr. John Rogers, our sedimentologist with whom I have taught this part of the field course for the last 4 years, will be retiring at the end of this year.
We were lucky to have the two new guys (our replacements) accompanying us for the trip, in a kind of hand-over. It was great to be in the field with them and see all the energy and interest and excitement they will bring to the department. They both saw a lot of research potential in the area too - I hope some of their plans will turn into future Honours projects for these students!

As you can see, they worked well together in the field. All the groups did. I haven't seen their final maps yet but I have a feeling they will be good.
Every year I change it up a little bit - we usually do a "structure training day" and a "sedimentology training day" before they start mapping on their own. This year it went particularly well. I decided to focus directly on field methods instead of rehashing the structure topics we discussed in the classroom. We practiced sketching from afar and ground-truthing the sketch, and talked a lot about scale and planning where to go. Here's an example of a student with his field sketch of a faulted anticline thrusted over a faulted anticline. That peaky Prince Albert Formation sure does take up a lot of the strain in this part of the fold belt.

Here we are on the last day - the last day, for me, of formal teaching at UCT. Pretty sad about that but also looking forward to the next phase of my life.

7/05/2009

Corona Heights Fault

Emily found this fault by searching the internet for local slickenline photos and landing at Andrew's site, geology.about.com. What did we do before the internet? The fault outcrops in the Castro Area (Corona Heights) where a post-1906 aggregate quarry has been repurposed for a playground and pet cemetery. The relatively recent exposure of the fault allows excellent preservation of the slip surface itself.

The fault is a thin breccia zone (less than a meter) with an anastomosing network of highly polished, slickenlined surfaces within the breccia zone.



Nils admiring his reflection in the fault surface. Seriously it is so so shiny. I've never seen anything like it. Twice now I have gone out to the Marin Headlands Terrane (same cherts) to look for fault surfaces and see if I can find anything similar. Can't. Went the second time because it was too foggy the first time and I worried I might have missed it.
Emily and Amir worked on a big normal fault in southern Oregon which had a similar fault rock structure - thin, superfine-grained polished slicked core, thin breccia zone with pinch-swell structures, rapidly dropping off to undeformed bedrock on either side of the fault. That thin breccia zone probably takes up a lot of deformation and accomodates the roughness on the polished slip surface. (See Sagy, Brodsky and Axen (2007) in Geology; it's available here.)

Here's Emily getting a grip on "Layer II", that granular layer which must break or flow in order for slip on these uneven, anastomozing polished surfaces to occur. Her hand is on that ~ 40cm layer of breccia in between two slip surfaces.

The texture of the polished surface is truly remarkable. You can see some rounded fragments of chert - which are green, while the local rock is all red chert. They are embedded in a translucent super fine-grained silica matrix. You can see through it. It is positively glassy (in a descriptive sense; I have not examined it for molecular structure). It has beautiful tensile cracks which are generally perpendicular to local slickenlines - and rotate as the slicks rotate and the fault surface undulates. Truly amazing.

OK what you can almost see in this photo are tiny round white spots in the superfine silica layer - they are lensoid fractures in the silica. I have some theories about what this stuff is and what the tiny fractures mean. But I have apparently been too far out on a limb lately (at least for some reviewers) so I will just ask you, on the off chance that anybody is still reading this blog...
1. What is the shiny, transluscent silica and how did it form?
2. Why does it have tiny lens-shaped fractures inside?

Probably the way I worded those questions leads toward my ideas about the answers... but ... anyway...











5/03/2009

Fully Equipped Field Geologist

Alright I'm a bit behind the curve here... but ever since The Lost Geologist posted a photo showing all the bells and whistles comprising the field geologist's kit, the world of geobloggers has been weighing in. (Also see... Geotripper, Hypocentre, Kim, the Ethical Palaeontologist, Johannes, Silver Fox, etc...)

Over the years I've developed some very climate and duration specific field kits. I hate to carry anything I don't need and I hate to be overloaded as to be uncomfortably hot. I also hate to run out of water and/or food.

Always have:
1. No Belt. I wear pants or shorts with many deep pockets. In those: Brunton Compass (I have one for S and one for N-hemisphere field work) Rite-In-The-Rain field book, at least 2 mechanical pencils, fatty eraser, many fine-tipped sharpies in multiple colours, a few big black sharpies for marking samples. Can't have enough sharpies. (often: cell phone, gps, whistle)

2. Handlens(s) on a chord around my neck.

3. At least twice the water I think I will need. Two or more pieces of fruit which are waste-free (I eat apple cores and orange peels rather than leave them in the field or carry them home. Thanks to Eric Thompson for long ago convincing me of the edibility of citrus peels). To keep this light as possible, I have knit some water bottle slings which I will use in place of carrying a pack if the water is all I'm bringing.

4. Map board - still using the Hilde Schwartz-style boards from UC Santa Cruz which are made from two pieces of plexiglass (one with a 1.5" bit cut off from one side), duct tape, and binder clips. Put the topo maps +/- aerial photos in here. I'm still looking for a replacement for standard binder clips which does not affect my compass, as I do end up taking measurements on the map board pretty often.

5. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches in zip-lock baggies (also twice as many as I think I could possibly need; these roll over every day if I don't eat them. They keep just fine, even improve with age(?), they're high energy, and there's no need to wash out the ziplock between pb&js.

6. Camera. Currently rocking the Canon EOS 1000D. Always with spare battery and SD cards.

Hot Weather Kit: Photo by Taufeeq Dhansay, Near Monapo, Mozambique (2008)

----That's it for the "always" items. ---

7. Hammer and heavy plastic bags, duct tape, and super glue for sampling - The way I do field work often involves several days of structural measurements at one outcrop or small area - normally then I do all the data collection and then set aside a day for sampling at the end. That way I don't a) smash anything I should have measured or b) take unneccessary samples before I understand the full picture. This has been a pretty important adaptation to my field plan because as a structural geologist who works on brittle rocks I NEED REALLY BIG ROCK SAMPLES and when rocks cross borders in Africa, they often have to go through customs with a certified currier company. This means I pay by the kilo. I want fewer, bigger, better samples.

----Matters of personal style---

When mapping in arid and semi-arid environments, I wear running shoes ("takkies") with short cotton socks. I hate being too hot more than I hate getting my legs all scratched up in the blasted fynbos. I wear SPF40 super waterproof sunscreen everywhere but somehow end up burned anyway.

When mapping in cold wet places, I wear NO COTTON WHATSOEVER not even underwear. Synthetics and wool only. In Alaska I often wear extra-tuffs while mapping in the field but I'm not sure this is the best way to go.

Hair: Always with the dual-braid configuration. Fits best under hats.

Hat: My SeaHawk Air hat has been my standard since 02. However, I lost it when it blew away in sub-gail force winds while I was sitting on top of a really fantastic sycline-axis koppie with a crinkly little bit of Prince Albert Formation in a sea of Dwyka diamictites. I got SeaHawk to send me another and it's almost as good. Finally, Sila talked me into getting a proper 360-degree brimmed floppy hat and it's ... alright. But I feel like such a dork.

Pants: Dork score increasing here: I wear zip-offs these days. Specifically, Convertable nylon pants from Cape Storm. They have kick-ass pockets with zippers so i don't lose keys. They look terrible because there is some bunchy elastic at the back for some odd reason. I don't care. They are light-weight and seemingly bulletproof, even in the face of elephant-skin weathering (also known as tareponts weathering to the Poleta crew).

Kit for Alaska field work: Photo: Asuka Yamaguchi, June 2006



---- Also, things that live in my backpack forever ---
knife
15m of good strong 3mm nylon line (good for clothesline if nothing else)
a powerbar or two of unknown antiquity
ziplock baggie of extra TP (also of unknown antiquity)


Ha ha I'm looking for pictures of myself in the field and I realize something that's present in nearly every photo but I completely forgot to add to the list:


Students. Not technically required for every field campaign but they sure do make it more fun. That's me in the green. Laingsburg field trip 2008. (not sure who took this picture.)

12/30/2008

mini field trip to the Rodeo Cove Thrust

Calling all Franciscan lovers out there - where are you? Are we going extinct? I am busy recruiting for our cult.

The Franciscan is the accretionary complex along the coast of California which preserves records of Mesozoic subduction: the wedge edge of the more famous Sierra Batholith-generating subduction zone. The Farallon Plate subducted under North America for over 100 MY until its tail edge hit the coast (with the Pacific Plate behind it) and the San Andreas Fault was born. While it was active the Farallon Trench subducted, offscraped, underthrusted and underplated a huge amount of marine sediment and a bit of igneous oceanic crust, mostly in discrete fault-bounded packets = terranes.
In the Marin Headlands, just north of San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge, you can see the contact between two terranes (white teeth) where an ocean-island seamount (Bonita Terrane) was thrust northeastward over a stack of greenstone-chert-sandstone nappes (Marin Headlands Terrane). Within those nappes of the Headlands Terrane, one major fault outcrops on the beach (black teeth): the Rodeo Cove Thrust. Also, it's frickin beautiful out there on Cronkite Beach and there's a really sweet hostel out there. Field trip planners take note.



The "Cron" is probably the most accessible, adequate surf spot in southern marin. The beach is pebbly and composed almost entirely of chert/ jasper in many colors of red, green, black, gray and orange, aka carnelian (apparently orange chert gains some kind of metaphysical significance?)

The beach divides the sea from the Rodeo Lagoon - happy birds. The bridge out to the beach makes it feel like you're leaving Marin behind.
My dear friend Francesca wrote an amazing paper about the Rodeo Cove Thrust*. Sadly she was not able to guide us on this field trip because she was needed in Italy to make soap out of olive oil. I am not making this up. Anyway, Francesca described the intense veined zone in the thrust:


The kiwi delegation checks out the veined zone, comparing it to kiwi veined zones:
At the top of the veined zone, a small, fault-bounded slab of pillows. VT observes that pillows are all nearly the same size, except for some rhyolitic pillows she has seen. I experience the dual sensations of the elation at realization that there is a such thing as a rhyolitic pillow and disappointment that my Geolutions list for 2009 is already full. Where are these rhyolitic pillows of unusual size?

A close-up look at the perlitic texture on the surface of the pillows. This texture forms when volcanic glass slowly hydrates and develops nano, then micro crystals over time. Glass is an uncomfortable state of being for cations and anions. This is evidence that the outside of the pillows were once glassy.

South of the pillows: greenstone cataclasite. Yummy. It's right about here that this old Mesozoic thrust fault is cross cut by a steep, NW-striking smectity gougey fault zone. The San Andreas is right off the beach. I think this young fault is part of the SAF. But this cataclasite... old or new? A bit of both maybe.

Coming next: Ring Mountain.

*Meneghini, F. and Moore, J. C. (2007) Deformation and hydrofracture at seismogenic depths: The Rodeo Cove thrust zone, Marin Headlands, California. Geological Society of America Bulletin 119 1-2, 174-183, DOI: 10.1130/B25807.1

9/30/2008

Dwykacious Injectites

The famous Dwyka "Tillites". As previously ranted on this blog, these are not lithified tills! They are glaciomarine. As proof, I offer the drop pebble. Isn't he cute. (top of photo is stratigraphic top)

The Dwyka Group contains one formation, the Elandsvlei Fm., making it the city and county of San Francisco of geologic Groups. Sorry if that's too corny for you. The whole package is matrix-supported, laminated and massive diamictites. The massive ones are ridge-formers in the field area and the laminated ones are valley-formers. They are informal called "coarse" for the ridge formers and "fine" for the valley formers but I actually think the difference is in cementation rather than grain size, possibly having to do with more abundant clays in the "fine" laminated units prohibiting silica circulation. The matrix is glacial rock flour, a very fine sediment (quartz/felspar ground down to clay-size particles) which is unique to glacial erosion.

Anyways, along some of these facies-boundaries we have channel sands. These are often called "eskers" but they are not true eskers as this is not a ground moraine.
Super TA Nic perched on the stratigraphic top of one of these channel sands - the dip is to the left on the photo at about 40*S and Nic is sitting on the top of the deepest part of the channel. Original vertical thickness is about 2m and the sand body tapers to the foreground and background (these represent the edges of the channel). This particular channel deposit has a nice coarse, well-rounded conglomerate around the edges - like a gravel bar? The matrix of the conglomerate is greenish-gray rock flour, resembling the rock into which the channel cut.

Here's where things get even better (and by "better" I mean "more structurally interesting"). See that long spindly (~15cm thick) sandy arm reaching gently UPSECTION from the sandstone channel? IT'S A SANDSTONE INJECTITE! If you look carefully at the photo (click to enlarge if you need to) you will see that the lamination in the gray-green matrix is going roughly across the photo while the dyke cuts upsection (and up-photo) to the left.

Injectites usually form when a porous, saturated sediment is overlain by a less porous sediment. The overlying rock acts as a seal and doesn't allow the water to escape from the porous sediment. Pressure increases as the sediments are buried and eventually the porous rock can become very "overpressured", with the trapped water in the pores carrying the weight of the rocks above. This is an unstable state and can only persist as long as the overlying seal rock can withstand the pressure! Eventually, the sealing rock fails - usually along a planar or curviplanar fracture - this occurs when the overpressure reaches a greater magnitude than the weight of the rock, or some kind of disturbance (earthquake, passing landslide or debris flow) triggers the failure. The high pressure fluid/sediment mixture escapes its former captivity by injecting outward and upward along the fractures. When the pressure is released, the water is free to move off but the sediment is left behind in the fractures, forming "injectites" or "sandstone dykes".

The injectites are found in a particular stratigraphic horizon in the Dwyka Group (2c/3f contact for those of you in the know) where small sandy bodies are common. The sand is coarse, well-sorted and nearly pure quartz (C. Herbert pers. comm. last week in the computer lab). Injectites are curviplanar with roughly parallel surfaces (although they sometimes undulate out of phase). Thickness varies from about 25cm to 3cm in the several examples Nic and I stumbled upon while looking for faults fortuitously discovered. The outer surfaces of the injectites are very smooth and polished. They are now quartz cemented and weather out relative to the finer-grained, less well-cemented rock flour matrix.


The outer wall surfaces of the injectites have a very distinctive texture - I don't know if it has a name, but it's something like flute marks but sort of braided looking.... Can anyone help me out here? Has this been described before? Perhaps my dear friend the "former" geologist can help.
Have I ever told you that you can't un-geologist yourself? It's like finding out about santa claus carter. Your world has rocks in it and that makes you different... forever.
Eh hem, excuse me. Anyway, the anastomosing flutes are about a centimeter to 3cm in wavelength, with high amplitude (~0.5x wavelength) and vary quite a bit in length. Sources say that the famous Panoche Hills injectite complex in central California may show similar clastic-dike-margin-textures... but on a larger scale...



The geometries fo the injectites can be rather complex - they are even sorted with coarsening towards the center - reflecting increased flow velocities with distance from the conduit walls. Here's Nic again sitting on what is either a) a folded injectite or b) the complex branching/intersection of multiple injectites - Somebody should find out!
What can these surface textures tell us about viscosity and velocity of injectites, strength of sediments, and fluid pressure in the ancient sub-glacial-icey seas? Somebody should find out! Who should that somebody be? I'm hoping one of my future honours students....


In case you doubt that these sandstone channels are submarine, I present you... the drop-boulder. I'm sorry, so sorry for this but each time I look at this picture I think of Cornwallis.

9/13/2008

Ptygmatic Folds in the Prince Albert Shales

The first exercise I do with the students when we begin working in Laingsburg is to have them run around just outside the field station and find a fold. Luckily this is not so hard as the Prince Albert Formation here is wrinkled like a raisin. I have some theories about this.
Sorry for the crap outcrop photo - should have taken the advice about
"morning vs. afternoon shots".

The Prince Albert Formation is early Permian in age and directly overlies the Dwyka Group diamictites dating from the Carboniferous-Permian Gondwanide glaciation. The paleo-latitude is about 70°S. I have a massive pet peeve about people calling the Dwyka Group "tillites" because that term clearly implies terrestrial origin and the rocks are very clearly submarine. The first person to describe the rocks (Alex du Toit in 1929) may not have known this but the very detailed work of JNJ Visser in the 70s and 80s made very clear the glacio-marine origin. If there's any doubt, please see: dropstones everywhere throughout the sequence. So don't say "Dwyka Tillite" to me unless you want to hear more about that. But I digress! I'll return to the Dwyka in future posts because I'm finding it more and more fun. Rock flour is weird.

Anyway, the Prince Albert Formation overlies the mudcracked glacial muds at the top of the Dwyka. It has a few meters of grayish pink shales/siltstones, followed by a few more meters of chestnut brown shales/siltstones, and then a few more meters yet of black shales/siltstones with blue phosphate nodules (and at least one 8-cm thick black chert bed, discovered by my students this year! Shout out to Klipdrift Group!). I'm being vague about thickness because nearly everywhere we see the Prince Albert in the Laingsburg area it is majorly folded and faulted and we actually have no clear idea how thick it should be. Looks like it was the preferential site for accomodating strain in the stratigraphic sequence. I would guess it is related to the big hard massive Dwyka diamictite below, and the relatively deformable Ecca Group turbidites above - those two strain very differently and the Prince Albert had to squish around to make up the difference. That would be the technical term of course. You see - this is how I check whether my students are plagiarising my blog.

Anyway, you can see in the photo above that some beds make nice concentric folds and others make parallel folds (see different shapes within the little syncline on the right). On this local scale, the thin yellowish ash beds flow into the hinges to accommodate the different shapes of adjacent folded beds. I think the Prince Albert Formation on a regional scale is doing the same thing the yellow ash beds are doing on this outcrop scale - flowing toward the hinges.

Maybe you need a refresher on folding mechanisms? Check this one out.

Do you see the amazing cleavage refraction?

Our class rep, also known as "the ginger kid" (in his own mind at least)
is impressed by the faulted folds.


The style of folds varies between the pinkish grey, chestnut and black members of the Prince Albert, I think as a function of viscosity variation in the strata. In the basal pinkish-grey member, there are lots of fine clayey shales and a few "siltstone" beds which are pretty hard and quartz cemented. This results in a thin stiff layer in a low viscosity matrix - the necessary condition for... (drum roll please)... PTYGMATIC FOLDS!






9/09/2008

A word about ecotones in the Klein Karoo

OK I have never pretended to be a biologist in spite of a growing fixation on succulents, but there are a few concepts from biology that just seem REALLY IMPORTANT and stuck with me somehow.

The first is the "ecotone" - basically the line marking the edge of the area where a species is successfully living (actual definition is more systemic) - so maybe i don't know the right term but I'm trying to say, the edge of the world for a particular species.

For example, anybody ever driven the Extraterrestrial Highway? Otherwise known as NV state route 375? It was laid out to skirt the Joshua tree ecotone - literally - on one side (south) of the highway there is a semi-geometric grid of Joshua Trees as far as the eye can see. On the other side.... none.

Why do I like this idea so much? It's pleasantly mathematical - as in calculus plus binary - somehow asymptotic to one, then zero. It has a pleasing physics sensation like quantum mechanics - can't see the line when you're looking at it? And in a geological sense - to which it is often correlated, any way - it reminds me of the brittle-ductile transition. A hard and distinct theoretical boundary - but more often than not, shifted or curved by strain rate, temperature, moisture, other mysterious factors.... easy to describe in the abstract, hard to pinpoint in the field. LOVE IT LOVE IT LOVE IT***.

This absolutely beautiful, Georgia-OKeefeish, [absolutely cuter than any foram] pink Aloe plant reminded me of the ECOTONE concept. Succulent people - please name it ??? This beauty and her blushing sisters were found on one hill, in one mapping area, facing one way, on one formation. Literally about 50m3 of real estate, bounded by changes in slope, strike or lithology. Beyond that - another subspecies of different colour, size or shape. To a girl from the California Chaparal this explodes my little mind. Even the plants here are on geologic time.... and the geology? on astronomic time I think. Billions instead of millions. I know I left nothing for scale but that aloe is about a meter across.


Two formations down section - we found this little beast. He is in the lower Prince Albert siltstones, which are pink. OK this section is often madly folded and thickened but the stratigraphic thickness is about 10m. Maybe 15m. Above that: Dark brown siltstones and shales. Below: green glaciomarine diamictites. Literally this guy crosses geologic boundaries and his whole life plan for camoflage is over.
I'm desperately sorry I don't have a photo, but THERE IS A DARK BROWN ONE EXACTLY LIKE HIM IN THE NEXT UNIT UPSECTION. again, a perfect match to the chippy opally silty rocks.


*** You know what i got a lot of crap for recently? "ILOVEITILOVEITSOMUCH".
Turns out this is just more evidence that Americans are flakey. but you know what? IDO FRICKIN LOVE IT SO MUCH. It's that great to be here and see these things. No time for post-colonial understatement.

It's that Field Mapping time of year again

Hey folks I'm back from Laingsburg again with the 2nd year field trip. Every year it seems to get better and better as the sedimentologist and I iron out the plan and I get to know the field. This year's class seemed particularly keen and that makes it even more fun of course. And since they've let me know they found this blog, I'll say they were also clever and good looking, and don't forget to turn in your course evaluations kids. Anyway.

Here's the now traditional "first fold photo" (see 2007 first fold photo). Always a bit of a step up learning about trend and plunge and remembering strike and dip. This year I had an extra prac during 2nd year structure and we used it to do some mock mapping exercises. Seemed like it helped. We were forced by the weather to do things a bit differently this year because it snowed/sleeted on our first day of instruction. What the hey? this is not why I moved to Africa, to field map under ice. At least, not Quaternary ice...

Anyway I'm going to try to arrange some more inclement weather for next year because that was the only day the students complained about the mapping conditions. Awesome.

I digress for a moment to show you a cute tiny angulate tortoise. What could be cuter?

We return to customary annual photos with the "giant pencil cleavage fencepost" installment for 2008 (see 2007 giant pencil cleavage fencepost). This beauty makes use of the Laingsburg Formation turbidite sands.
Sunrise on the last morning in camp:
Time to rise and shine!
more hard core geology posts to come!

8/17/2008

Mineralogy MacGyver

What do you do when you're out in the field and you really really wish you could positively identify a particular mineral? There are ways of doing this which are no longer taught - involving powders and torches and things like that - I never learned these methods, these days we just take the rock home and make a thin section.

We were in northern Mozambique looking at what appear to be charnockitized gneisses - which should by definition contain pyroxene - normally orthopyroxene. However, the thin sections we made last year just had clumpy biotite - maybe replacing opx? But without finding any remnant opx we couldn't be sure if it had ever been there, or if all the patchiness we could see in the rock was just clumpy biotite. We crushed up some of the gneisses, which wasn't too hard to do because they have a nice "sugary", recrystallized annealed texture and readily fall into angular "sand". Some of the grains had a greenish smokey luster - possible orthopyroxene? Or just ugly looking feldspars? Or quartz with some micro inclusions? If only we could see the birefringence of the mineral grains we could readily pick out the opx - which has higher birefringence - from the feldspar and quartz, which have similar, low birefringence.

Birefringence is the effect when light passes through a crystal more quickly in one direction than in another, effectively splitting light like a prism. The strength of this effect varies with the wavelength of light as well as with the properties of the crystal. The birefringence of different minerals is a characteristic feature that can be used to identify them. To see this effect, geologic microscopes use two polarizing filters. Full-spectrum light is passed through a polarizing filter and then through a thin section of rock (30-microns is the usual thickness for this slide). Then the light passes through a second, polarizing filter perpendicular to the first one and through to your eye.

Two polarizing filters at right angles to each other will block all light - so if there is no rock slide in the path of the light, or if there is just glass or some other isotropic material in the path of the light, you will see nothing at all. However, a birefringent rock sample will take the oriented light and twist it - allowing some of it to pass through the second filter. The colour you see will change depending on how strongly the mineral "twists" the rays of light.


So what to do in the field with no slide, no microscope, no way to estimate the birefringence of these mineral grains? Kosuke came up with an answer - like geologist MacGyver. He used the polarizing filters from his camera lenses - mounted them on an incandescent head lamp (torch) and put the mineral grains in between. He then carefully rotated the top filter so that it blocked out all light except for what was passing through the mineral grains. Voila! A field petrographic microscope!

Did it work? Sadly, not really. The problem was, of course, that all the mineral grains had different diameters and therefore the path of light through the minerals wasn't constant. As the colour you see is a function of the length of path as well as the properties of the crystal, we couldn't keep this factor constant and were left with uncertain results. However, it was a pretty good exercise (and a lot of fun) and a reminder of the basic principles of geology which we sometimes take for granted.

You know what? Identifying rocks is pretty hard. Very few minerals come in only one color or shape, and a little bit of weathering or deformation can change the appearance of a rock pretty drastically. Geologists and geology students have to learn a whole range of criteria which change from place to place and rock to rock. It's a lifetime effort to learn to identify rocks, accelerated by seeing as many rocks as one possibly can but one can never hope to see them all.

In accretionary wedges - my "specialty" (if I have one, that is) - low temperature metamorphism and high strain can result in all the rocks looking pretty much the same - it can be very difficult to tell an igneous rock (eg. basaltic ash from the ocean floor) from a sedimentary one (e.g. volcaniclastic greywacke). It's hard to tell students that the first basic thing we tell them about rocks - that there are 3 types (igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary) might be the last thing you figure out about a particular rock sample. Some day when I have the time I'd like to teach myself some of those old techniques for identifying minerals without a microscope - I'm sure they would come in handy.

7/16/2008

¡Acuñas!

You might wonder what the locals in rural Nampula province think about a bunch of geologists stomping around their villages asking "Pedras? Aqui? Mais pedras?"

They think we are frickin nuts.

Field Fantastic!

Just back from Mozambique and covered in red dirt - I have only one question for you tonight:
What happens when a Pan-African pegmatitic granite intrudes a mid-crustal shear zone in the middle of the construction of Gondwana?

Answer: one of two things:

Those would be augen formed from entrained feldspar crystals in the intruding magma, or,

Those would be rafts of mylonite floating in a granite.

7/08/2008

Snowball Earth Strata near Kogelfontein

Some time ago, in the middle of an igneous field trip no less, we were out on the coast of Namaqualand near the Kogelfontein igneous complex. The Kogelfontein rocks are Cretaceous, which to a South African is pretty much Yesterday, or in other words, that piddly small part of the geologic time scale that nobody bothers to learn. Did I mention that my students don't learn the Phanerozoic part of the time scale? And similarly, I never learned the other 80% of the time scale? Remind me to chalk that up on my list of SA-USA translation problems in English. I do feel like I've been accepted to some degree, with all my idosyncracies, because people don't correct me anymore when I say "Al-U-Min-Um"**. But I digress... it is a blog after all.

Anyway we took a detour to see this incredible outcrop of interbedded black turbiditic shales and clean, beautiful white marble. Yes, shales (sedimentary) and marble (metamorphic, or should I just say recrystallized).
This assemblage, Neoproterozoic* in age, is a key assemblage in the Snowball Earth story - a story better told by other outcrops in other places, perhaps, but there's evidence for it here if you accept it as such. The story goes that at 600Ma (give or take), the earth experienced a total glaciation - most of the continental landmass at the time was at high latitudes, close to the poles, and as earth cooled and entered the glacial period the continents were completely covered by ice sheets. If you're familiar with the concept of albedo - the reflectivity of the earth - you will know that rocks will absorb light and heat from the sun and re-emit it all as heat, warming the atmosphere. Ice, on the other hand, will reflect the majority of that energy back to space, and will not do the nice turn-light-into-heat action that bare land can do. The bare land bit is important here, because this is hundreds of millions of years before plants, or fungi, or any of those great heat collectors working for us today emerged onto land. So a planet with its land mass covered in ice is a very cold planet indeed, and has lost its means for warming itself from the sun's heat.

As the story goes, tectonics was still chugging away under all that ice, warming the oceans from mid-ocean ridge volcanoes and supporting tiny islands of bacterial life. The combined effect of the geothermal heat and the CO2 from volcanoes and life was eventually enough to break the cycle of cooling, and the planet warmed again. As land began to see the sun, the warming sped up and the oceans warmed up very quickly.

One of the fascinating things about CaCO3, that is marble, that is the most common mineral form of CO2, is that it is reversely soluble - that is, it dissolves more easily in cold water than in hot. That's the opposite of most everything, sugar, salt, most other minerals... So when the oceans were cold, there was a lot of CO2 dissolved in them. When the oceans warmed up quickly, all that CO2 was no longer stable in the dissolved state and CaCO3 - limestones - precipitated on the seafloor all over the world. We usually associate limestones with warm shallow places - coral reefs, etc. - but in the late-Neoproterozoic warming, limestones were forming everywhere, even in the very deep sea. Enter the outcrop at Kogelfontein.

The black shales here are deep water deposits (again, or so the story goes) that are very rarely found in association with limestones, anywhere in the rock record. Here they are together, repeated at least a couple of times: a shale, a limestone, a shale, a limestone. Or is it?

Here's trusty TA Duane pointing out the reason for the repetition. The reddish rounded lump he's standing on is the long thin hinge of an isoclinal bedding parallel fold - the axial plane of the fold lies in the plane of bedding.
The fold is ultimately doubly-plunging - it rounds off at both ends like a big sausage (that would be wors in local parlance) but there are others along strike. And in between, some beautiful evidence of tectonic interference with the stratal succession: shear foliations in otherwise sugary marbles, and strange little cuspate-lobate structures on ptygmatic folds (not sure what that folded bed is). That ZA 50-center is the size of a US quarter.


Here's a shot down the axis where a quartz-rich bed is desperately trying to maintain its radius of curvature in spite of the drag:


So the moral of the story is: earth warmed up, and here we are. Whether these marine seds actually provide anything more than circumstantial evidence for Snowball Earth and catastrophic warming of the oceans is still under debate. The other moral of the story is: don't measure section in an accretionary complex***.


*Neoproterozoic is about 1Ga -> Cambrian, for those who share my timescale bias problems.
** as opposed to "Al-Yu-Min-E-Um"
***I don't really know if it's an accretionary complex. It's supposed to be an along-strike equivalent to the Malmesbury Group down here in Cape Town. But that's an axe to grind for another post.