Malmesbury Group and the SeaPoint Contact

The Geological Society of South Africa, Western Cape Branch held its end-of-year field trip on Saturday 8 Jan. I have been working on this blog post since then but got distracted writing a shorter (less slangy) summary for the GSSA WCB newsletter. So sorry but here it is finally. It was a walk through the Tygerberg terrane of the Malmesbury Group up to the lit-par-lit contact with the Cape Granite at Sea Point, Cape Town. Now don't give up yet, I'll tell you what all that means in a minute. The leaders were Prof. Alex Kisters (structure) from U. Stellenbosch and my dear friend Dr. John Rogers (sedimentology) from good ol' UCT.

Zircon is a great little mineral that grows during igneous or metamorphic heating in rocks, and it takes in all the Uranium. After the hot period ends, the uranium starts to decay, like a little stopwatch in the rock. This makes it possible to date the igneous or metamorphic heating in a rock. If that rock then erodes, dumping sediment into an ocean basin, the zircon's other special feature comes into play - it's darn hard. It survives all that tossing around and when you collect the sediment millions or billions of years later, it's still intact, tiny stopwatch ticking away. Even if the sed has been through another heating event, it's possible to find some of the little grains which didn't reset their clocks. So you can say, the age of the youngest zircon stopwatch in the sediment (or detritus) is an older boundary on the age of the sedimentary deposit. See? cool.

Anyway, the Malmesbury Group is a huge pile of shale-siltstone-sandstone deposited in the latest preCambrian times. It is therefore not fossiliferous in the least, which makes it somewhat more difficult to determine exactly how old it is. Some people have picked detrital zircons out of it that give 3 age groups: 2 billion years, ~1.5 billion years, and 545 million years. This means the part of the Malmesbury where these data were collected was deposited after 545Ma.

John got us started off with an orientation at Three Anchor Bay. John can be counted on for all kinds of maps, rocks, artifacts, old theses, any type of "visual aid" one could possibly wish for on a field trip!

The sedimentary structures came on fast and furious. You would have to hike miles and miles across Kodiak to find a tenth of the good stuff we saw in less that a mile of strolling. Here is a gorgeous bed that I (and Saranne Cessford, thereby earning me some credibility) interpreted as a rip-up bed: that is, a bed of sandstone, minding its own business on the seafloor, got torn up by a mudflow! which ripped it into blocks, later to settle out in the mud.

Mega version of the same: a true Olistostrome! Here full big sandstone beds have been tumbled and broken in a massive mudflow. This one is only about 4m thick but imagine if it were an order of magnitude thicker - that's where it starts getting really complicated to tell if a melange (or mix of rocks) is made by sedimentary processes or tectonic processes. Ask me later why that even matters, it's a whole nother question.

OK now for the real fun: Name That Structure (NTS). We used to play this game as undergrads, when we were first learning structures... Thinking, no doubt, that this was a rookie pursuit and we would soon run out of structures we couldn't identify. WRONG.

Something weird happening here, not immediately obvious. It has to do with bedding-cleavage intersection, but the bedding is not... normal. is it caused by the cleavage? or is the cleavage wrapping around some weird bedding features? Two pictures and then my theories. First outcrop photo: vertical joint surface normal to bedding strike, cleavage is vertical, bedding dips ~50° to your right. Second photo, cleavage barely right-dipping, bedding is left-dipping, and the big limpet is ~2cm long axis.

Theories (and I should say here that initial impressions split quite neatly between sedimentary and structural geologists):
1. Scallopy bedding - these are ripple marks with sand lags into the troughs. Cleavage later wrapped around them.
2. Structural feature - less well defined but since the wavelength is seriously perfectly regular, as well as the amplitude, and these only occur in the fold hinge - maybe they are some kind of disharmonic folding.
3. Rayleigh-Taylor discontinuities, with top planed off by subsequent turbidity currents, overprinted by pressure solution cleavage which intensifies within R-T "intrusions".

Obviously option 3 is all me and I can't blame anybody else for it. However I'm currently 60% for option 1. Opinions? How come nobody comments on my blog? And is it really true that the Japanese geologists have a petrol-rockblade-skillsaw which would be the perfect sampling solution to this kind of problem?

We get closer and closer to the contact with the granites and little dikes (dykes; ZA) seem to emerge everywhere - dikes which are folded with the pressure solution cleavage - serious compression (ductile!) during the granitic intrusion - leaving NO EVIDENCE whatsoever in the absence of active strain markers. Isn't that beautiful?

Here we have John showing Alex's sketch of the contact. The cross section Alex drew is visible to the naked eye in the profile of Lion's head which we could see from the road. Really nice place to see into the rocks. In the foreground you can see my pal Kirsten from Dresden. She runs the new ICPMS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer) at work, that is, unless Eskom randomly shuts off power to random neighborhoods at random times during the day for 2-2.5 hr intervals. Oh wait that's exactly what's going on! It's called "load sharing". Maybe Ken Lay faked his own death and has found a new liberal state to punish with Enron style rolling blackouts! Or maybe not. but I digress...
Now we come to the best part. As you can see in the hillside of Lion's Head, above, we were walking from the black shales toward the edge of a big granite batholith. The contact runs right through Lion's Head and the 403Ma sandstones unconformably overlie it. As we approached the contact there were more and more little granite dikes, then bigger, then we started seeing evidence of macroscopically ductile flow in the black shales as well as the pinkish granites:
The layering is parallel to the contact, as if the granitic magma squeezed its way up hundreds of tiny parallel cracks into the black shales. There is a bit of a metamorphic aureole but really it's only a few 10's meters wide of spotty hornfels - not too hot and not too big. That's a good piece of evidence to suggest that instead of one big giant bubble of hot magma, which would have really cooked the rock around it, the whole body of granites might have arrived slowly over a long period, through tiny cracks. Kind of like ants in my kitchen... one then 10 then 1000...

The big square crystals you see are feldspars that crystallized in the magma chamber at depth and were carried up with the migrating magma. You can see in this photo that some of them seem not to be in the pink granite, but are actually surrounded with black shales. How is that done? Alex gave an explanation based on Norm Sleep's (Stanford) theory using a really elegant fluid pressure model of one of these tiny cracks. Here's Alex with his explanatory sketch, which didn't photograph, so here's my attempt to recreate it:
Anyway all the parallel dikes create an overall gradational contact where there are thicker and more frequent dikes until one crosses the contact and then it's all granite. This is called lit-par-lit or bed-by-bed.

so the question that remains: did the shale melt? or just deform viscously (but very slowly) under high temperature?

There are some conspicuously NOT FLUID looking blocks in there.


Anonymous said...

Hi Christie,

Your blog should include a warning -- "NOT TO BE USED FOR UNDEGRADS ASSIGNMENTS" !

One of my third years handed in a field report after last week's trip to Sea Point, that contained quite a few verbatim extracts from this page...

By the way there is a display bug on this page, the "post comment" link exists but can not be seen on the page...


Anonymous said...



情趣用品,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,日本AV,寄情築園小遊戲,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,色情遊戲,一葉情貼圖片區,色情網站,色情影片,微風成人, 嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人影片,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,080視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室



麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打

麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,線上遊戲,矽谷麻將,明星3缺一,橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,遊戲區,電玩快打,cs online

情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊

Cheap Cigarettes said...

Buy cheap cigarettes online!

Stanley Becker said...

I am not an academic geologist but I was born in Sea Point, climbed Lion's Head four or five times a week in the winter during my youth. I have a definite affinity with the Malmesbury Group of rocks. I was always fascinated that the evolutionist Darwin had stood on the psychedelic swirls [intrusions] at Queens Beach [I was especially intrigued by the beautiful Victorian type plaque [now sadly, not extant].
I have developed a few theories concerning the black rock in which I see the sediment [now black rock] oozing out from deep earth at or within a billion years of the Earth's formation as a solid sphere with the ooze being part of the Earth's plaque system [closing up lesions in the outer reaches of the sphere so that surface stability could be established [part of the cooling process]
The granite overlays much of the Malmesbury Group and where you have intrusion I always read as being linked to epicenter or a maximization of temperature at Queen's Beach [the later Granite event]to account for the exclusive nature of some of the events that took place here.
Sir, could you please disabuse me or otherwise confirm in what way are my theories plausible or phantasies as I am always ready to be better informed Yours Stanley Becker